<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

    <journal>
    <language>en</language>
    <journal_id_issn>2008-2835</journal_id_issn>
    <journal_id_issn_online>2008-4625</journal_id_issn_online>
    <journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
    <journal_id_doi></journal_id_doi>
    <journal_id_isnet></journal_id_isnet>
    <journal_id_iranmedex>276</journal_id_iranmedex>
    <journal_id_magiran>5669</journal_id_magiran>
    <journal_id_sid>11181</journal_id_sid>
    <pubdate>
	    <type>gregorian</type>
	    <year>>2025</year>
	    <month>>April-June</month>
	    <day></day>
    </pubdate>
    <volume>17</volume>
    <number>2</number>
    <publish_type>online</publish_type>
    <publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
    <article_type>fulltext</article_type>
    <articleset>

<article>
	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
	<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
	<article_id_pubmed>40453918</article_id_pubmed>
	<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
	<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
	<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA)-ELISA as an Isothermal Molecular  POCT Method for Bacterial Respiratory Infection Diagnosis </title>
	<subject_fa></subject_fa>
	<subject></subject>
	<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
	<content_type></content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Background: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs) are a leading cause of childhood mortality worldwide, especially in African and Southeast Asian countries. Point of Care Test (POCT) techniques provide faster diagnoses compared to conventional or real-time PCR methods. Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) offers rapid on-site detection of these infections. Coupling RPA with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) (RPA-ELISA) creates a cost-effective alternative, ideal for clinical applications. This study evaluates RPA-ELISA as a rapid diagnostic tool for bacterial respiratory infections.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Methods: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;From&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;11&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;August 2022 to 9 February 2023, respiratory samples were collected and processed using culture methods, biochemical tests, real-time PCR, and RPA assays. The RPA reactions were conducted at 39&lt;em&gt;&amp;deg;C&lt;/em&gt; for 30 &lt;em&gt;min&lt;/em&gt;, and ELISA was used for detection. Statistical analyses focused on sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Values (PPV), and Negative Predictive Values (NPV).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Results: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Forty-two respiratory samples, were collected in this period of which 10 samples showed no growth,&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;and 32 tested positive. Among these positive samples, 15 isolates (35.7%) were identified as&lt;em&gt; &lt;em&gt;Klebsiella pneumoniae&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;K. pneumoniae&lt;/em&gt;), 14 isolates (33.3%) as &lt;em&gt;Streptococcus pneumoniae&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;S. pneumoniae&lt;/em&gt;), and 3 isolates (7.1%) as &lt;em&gt;Moraxella catarrhalis&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;M. catarrhalis&lt;/em&gt;). RPA-ELISA demonstrated 100% sensitivity for all pathogens, comparable to or better than RT-PCR, but had slightly lower specificity and PPV. RT-PCR achieved 100% specificity and PPV for all pathogens, indicating higher accuracy; yet, RPA-ELISA&amp;#39;s sensitivity points to its effectiveness as a rapid screening tool.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;RPA-ELISA is significantly faster than real-time PCR and culture methods. Its ease of use makes it suitable for on-site diagnoses in resource-limited environments. Limitations include a small sample size for certain bacteria and the necessity for further validation in varied clinical contexts.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Isothermal methods, Point of Care Test (POCT), Respiratory infections, RPA, RPA-ELISA</keyword>
	<start_page>114</start_page>
	<end_page>121</end_page>
	<web_url>https://www.ajmb.org/En/Article.aspx?id=60609</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://www.ajmb.org/PDF/En/FullText/60609.pdf</pdf_url>
	<author_list><author><first_name>Reza</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Azizian</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Biomedical Innovation and Start-up Student Association, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92337</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Erfaneh</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Jafari</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Biomedical Innovation and Start-up Student Association, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92338</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Babak</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Pourakabri</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation></affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92339</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Setareh</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Mamishi</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Pediatric Infectious Diseases Research Center (PIDRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92340</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Reihaneh</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Hosseinpour Sadeghi</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Pediatric Infectious Diseases Research Center (PIDRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92341</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Maryam</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Sotoudeh Anvari</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Children’s Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92342</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author></author_list>
</article>

</articleset>
</journal>

