<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

    <journal>
    <language>en</language>
    <journal_id_issn>2008-2835</journal_id_issn>
    <journal_id_issn_online>2008-4625</journal_id_issn_online>
    <journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
    <journal_id_doi></journal_id_doi>
    <journal_id_isnet></journal_id_isnet>
    <journal_id_iranmedex>276</journal_id_iranmedex>
    <journal_id_magiran>5669</journal_id_magiran>
    <journal_id_sid>11181</journal_id_sid>
    <pubdate>
	    <type>gregorian</type>
	    <year>>2024</year>
	    <month>>April-June</month>
	    <day></day>
    </pubdate>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <number>2</number>
    <publish_type>online</publish_type>
    <publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
    <article_type>fulltext</article_type>
    <articleset>

<article>
	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_issn></article_id_issn>
	<article_id_issn_online></article_id_issn_online>
	<article_id_pubmed>38618510</article_id_pubmed>
	<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
	<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
	<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Poultry Gastrointestinal-derived Lactic Acid Bacteria (pGIT-d-LAB) Inhibit Multiple  Antibiotics Resistance Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens</title>
	<subject_fa></subject_fa>
	<subject></subject>
	<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
	<content_type></content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Background:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt; To develop a probiotic formulation for poultry feed, a few poultry gastrointestinal derived lactic acid bacteria (pGIT-d-LAB) were isolated from chicken intestinal specimens and &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt; experiment was performed to evaluate their efficacy as potential probiotic candidate.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Methods:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt; A total of 6 strains of LAB: &lt;em&gt;L&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;actobacillus brevis&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;em&gt;L. brevis&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;em&gt;,&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;L&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;actobacillus acidophilus &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;L. acidophilus&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;em&gt;, Lactobacillus casei &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;L. casei&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;em&gt;, Pediococci &lt;/em&gt;spp.&lt;em&gt;, Lactobacillus fermentum &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;L. fermentum&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;and&lt;em&gt; L&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;actobacillus plantarum &lt;/em&gt;(&lt;em&gt;L. plantarum&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;were isolated and cultured for collection of Cell Free Supernatant (CFS). CFS collected was tested against pathogenic bacterial isolated from chicken feces as well as prevalent fungal pathogens, utilizing agar-well diffusion techniques. A preliminary investigation into the susceptibility of the pathogens to diverse antibiotics and antifungal drugs was conducted. Bacterial pathogens exhibiting resistance to a minimum of three classes of antibiotics were subsequently identified for pGIT-d-LAB CFS screening. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Results:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt; The observed results revealed that the CFS derived from the isolates exhibited varying degrees of growth inhibition against different pathogens. Among the tested pGIT-d-LAB isolates, &lt;em&gt;L. acidophilus &lt;/em&gt;demonstrated the most prominent zone of inhibition, measuring 18 &lt;em&gt;mm&lt;/em&gt; against &lt;em&gt;Klebsiella pneumoniae&lt;/em&gt; ZTAC 1233. Notably, &lt;em&gt;Citrobacter diversus&lt;/em&gt; ZTAC 1255 showed resistance to all tested pGIT-d-LAB. Quantification of the metabolites produced was performed, and peak production levels was determined. &lt;em&gt;L.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt; acidophilus &lt;/em&gt;produced the highest amount of lactic acid (1.789&lt;em&gt;g/l&lt;/em&gt;), &lt;em&gt;Pediococci &lt;/em&gt;spp. produced the highest amount of diacetyl and H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;0&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; (1.918&lt;em&gt;g/l&lt;/em&gt;) (0.0025&lt;em&gt;g/l&lt;/em&gt;) at 48&lt;em&gt; hr&lt;/em&gt; peak values respectively. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:10.0pt&quot;&gt; The test isolates are potential probiotic candidates for controlling pathogens in poultry. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Antibacterial agents, Chickens, Lactic acid, Poultry, Probiotics</keyword>
	<start_page>111</start_page>
	<end_page>119</end_page>
	<web_url>https://www.ajmb.org/En/Article.aspx?id=60574</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://www.ajmb.org/PDF/En/FullText/60574.pdf</pdf_url>
	<author_list><author><first_name>Bolanle</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Adeniyi</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation></affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92173</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Abimbola</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Adesuyi </last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92174</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Funmilola</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Ayeni </last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92175</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Temitope</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Ogunbanwo </last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92176</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author><author><first_name>Taiwo</first_name><middle_name></middle_name><last_name>Agidigbi</last_name><suffix></suffix><affiliation>Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria</affiliation><first_name_fa></first_name_fa><middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa><last_name_fa></last_name_fa><suffix_fa></suffix_fa><email></email><code>92177</code><coreauthor></coreauthor><affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa></author></author_list>
</article>

</articleset>
</journal>

