AJMB Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology 2008-2835 2008-4625 Avicenna Research Institute AJMB-1-147 Review Article Sperm Chromatin Integrity: Etiologies and Mechanisms of Abnormality, Assays, Clinical Importance, Preventing and Repairing Damage Hekmatdoost Azita 1 2 Lakpour Niknam 1 Sadeghi Mohammad Reza 1 * Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition & Food Industry, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Corresponding author: Mohammad Reza Sadeghi, Ph.D., Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. P.O. Box: 19615-1177. Tel: +98 21 22432020. Fax: +98 21 22432021. E-mail: Sadeghi@avicenn.ac.ir October-December 2009 1 3 147 160 08 09 2009 01 12 2009 Copyright © 2009 Avicenna Research Institute 2009

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

The standard semen analysis is the first line and the most popular laboratory test in the diagnosis of male fertility. It evaluates sperm concentration, motility, morphology and their vitality. However, it is well-known that normal results of semen analysis can not exclude men from the causes of couples′ infertility. One of the most important parameters of sperm in its fertilizing potential is “Sperm chromatin integrity” that has direct positive correlation with Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) outcomes including; fertilization rate, embryo quality, pregnancy and successful delivery rate. It seems that sperm DNA chromatin integrity provides better diagnostic and prognostic approaches than standard semen parameters. For these reasons under-standing the sperm chromatin structure, etiology of sperm chromatin abnormality, identification factors that disturbs sperm chromatin integrity and the mechanism of their action can help in recognizing the causes of couples′ infertility. Various methods of its evaluation, its importance in male fertility, clinical relevance in the outcomes of ART and application of laboratory and medical protocols to improve this integrity have valuable position in diagnosis and treatment of male infertility. There has recently been interest in the subject and its application in the field of andrology. Therefore, with regard to the above mentioned importance of sperm chromatin integrity, this review article describes details of the useful information pertaining to sperm DNA damage including the origins, assessments, etiologies, clinical aspects, and prevention of it.

Chromatin DNA Damage Fertility Male Spermatozoa
Introduction

Infertility is a major problem in 15–20% of couples trying to conceive in the reproductive ages (1). Male infertility may contribute in half of all couples who refer to infertility clinics (2).

The standard semen analysis is the first line and the most popular laboratory test in the diagnosis of male fertility. It evaluates sperm concentration, motility, morphology and vitality. However, it is well-known that normal results of semen analysis can not exclude men from causes of couples′ infertility (3).

Today, it is well known that the quality and integrity of sperm chromatin is very important in the reproductive potential of men. Sperm DNA is known to contribute to half of the genomic material of the embryo. Sperm chromatin is much more compact in somatic cells, with the aim of protecting the paternal genetic materials against damaging factors during its passage from testis as production site to fallopian tubes as final destination (4).

It is a fact that normal sperm genomic material is required for a normal fertilization, pregnancy, live birth, and postnatal child well being. Therefore, abnormal sperm chromatin may result in male sub-fertility or even infertility, recurrent abortion, increased congenital anomalies and testicular cancer in offsprings (5). Thus, more knowledge on sperm chromatin damage including: etiology, mechanism, detection methods, clinical outcomes and treatment may provide better diagnostic and prognostic capabilities than standard sperm parameters for both in vivo and in vitro fertilizing ability of human spermatozoa (6).

Etiology of sperm chromatin damage

Many factors are involved in inducing sperm DNA damage, which may result in the male infertility. One of these factors is Leukocytospermia (7), which is the increase of leukocytes in semen due to genital infection and/or inflammation (8).

Leukocytospermia could result in the production of inflammatory cytokines followed by the overproduction of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) leading to increase in sperm DNA damage (9, 10). Cigarette smokes also induce leukocytospermia and ROS overproduction (1113) It seems that leukocytes can generate high levels of ROS in semen, which may overwhelm the antioxidant capacity of semen and resultant Oxidative Stress (OS) could disturb sperm functions (14, 15).

Also, some of the sperm preparation and cryopreservation protocols could decrease sperm chromatin integrity (16, 17). It has been shown that rapid and ultra rapid freezing (flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen) induce the least damage to sperm during cryopreservation (18). Malignancies such as leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, and testicular malignnancies could affect sperm chromatin integrity by themselves or following their treatment with cytotoxic drugs and/ or radiation therapy (1922).

Many drugs might also affect the semen quality and increase sperm DNA damage (2325). Even some types of herbal remedies may induce sperm DNA damage. For example high dose administration of Gingko biloba, St. John's wort and Echinacae purpura were associated with increased damage of the reproductive cells (26).

Finally, a growing body of evidences shows that environmental and occupational exposures to chemical agents, heat, and agricultural toxins could play a role in sperm DNA damage (10). In a recent study, it has been shown that increased scrotal heat not only reduces the quality of semen parameters, but also compromises sperm chromatin integrity (27).

Mechanism of Sperm DNA Damage

While the exact causes of sperm DNA damage have not yet been fully elucidated, several interrelated mechanisms have been suggested (2830). These mechanisms are categorized as abnormal chromatin packaging, apoptosis and oxidative stress.

Abnormal chromatin packaging

The sperm chromatin is an extremely compact and stable structure which must be organized in a specific manner to achieve this unique condensed state (31). This DNA organization provides more safe and secure transfer of paternal genetic information to the egg and next generation. Sperm chromatin is organized in a manner completely different from that of somatic cells (32, 33).

During changes in sperm chromatin compaction, histones are replaced by transition proteins. These proteins are then replaced by more basic proteins named protamine (P1,P2), which are responsible for the final condensation and stabilization of sperm DNA (34). Sperm DNA interacts with protamines so that it converts the coiling of sperm DNA into toroidal subunits so called as “Doughnut loops” (35).

Although defects can arise at any stage of this process, the most common problems are due to abnormal DNA loop domain formation and histon-protamine replacement (34).

DNA loop domains are arranged by endogenous nicks. It is believed that these nicks are needed to reduce the torsional stress. These nicks are mainly produced during transition from round to elongated spermatids in the testis and occur before complete protamination of sperm nuclei. These loop domains are created and ligated by topoisomerase II during this process (36, 37).

Thus, the enzyme disturbance can result in defect in packaging of sperm DNA and may be contribute to male infertility. It is suggested that enzyme inhibitors might increase the levels of internal DNA breaks by preventing their repair and increasing their susceptibility to damage (38).

The histones should be replaced by protamines during sperm DNA packaging for more chromatin condensation (39). Human sperm has 2 different types of protamines in equal amounts: P1 and P2 (40). Recent studies indicate that the ratio of P1 to P2 is critical for sperm's fertilization ability (3941). Also, it has been shown that P2 precursors (pre-P2) play a pivotal role in maintaining this ratio. Any defect in pre-P2 mRNA translation appears to cause abnormal sperm morphogenesis, reduced sperm motility, and subsequent male infertility (42, 43). Moreover, the chromatin stability depends on the number of disulfide cross-slinks between thiol groups of adjacent protamine chains (34, 44).

More recent data indicate that the stabilization of chromatin begins in the testis and continues during its passage through the epididymis (44). As sperm migrates along the epididymis, cysteine sulfhydryl groups in testicular sperm are progressively oxidized to disulfide bounds that increases compaction of DNA-protamine complex (4, 45, 46). Disturbance at any stage of this process can lead to permanent defects in sperm chromatin.

Apoptosis

A number of studies have proposed that the presence of spermatozoa containing apoptosis signals such as damaged DNA is indicative of escaping sperm of the apoptosis process, which is referred to as “abortive apoptosis” (47).

Spermatogonial stem cells proliferate clonally during mitoses before undergoing the differentiation steps. This proliferation is excessive and needs a mechanism such as apoptosis to match the number of them with the supportive capacity of sertoli cells (48). Therefore, apoptosis is a vital mechanism to control the over production of sperm (49).

Pathways involving the cell-surface protein Fas may mediate apoptosis in sperm (5052). Thus, the Fas positive germ cells will be killed by apoptosis to reduce their population. The number of Fas positive spermatozoa is very small in fertile men. However, Fas-positive spermatozoa may consist half of the sperm in men with abnormal semen parameters. Thus the correct clearance of spermatozoa via apoptosis has not occurred, and the presence of spermatozoa with apoptotic markers such as Fas molecules and DNA breakage, indicates an “abortive apoptosis” in these men (53).

Another main component of apoptotic pathways are caspases enzymes (54). Caspases 8 and 9 are activated via Fas ligand/ Fas ligation in the inner layer of mitochondrial membrane. Following activation, they conduct a signal to their effector such as caspase 3, which activate the caspase-activated DNAse resulting in degradation of sperm DNA, and apoptosis (55).

Finally, telomere shortening is another inducer of apoptotic pathway which can contribute to the abortive apoptosis theory (56).

Oxidative stress

The most common cause of sperm DNA damage is Oxidative Stress (OS) (5759). OS is an imbalance between the formation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and the capacity of antioxidant scavengers to neutralize or eliminate them. The ROS might damage DNA through modification or deletions of bases, frame shifts, DNA cross linkages, chromosomal rearrangement, single and double strand DNA breaks, and gene mutations (6062).

ROS are produced in sperm through leakage of electrons from the mitochondrial electron transport chain (63), NADPH oxidase (64) and generation of nitric oxide (NO) (65). The origin of ROS may be from the outside of the sperm and even from the outside of the body. The extrinsic sources of ROS include: cigarette smoking, increased scrotal temperature, electromagnetic radiations (cell phone), and organophosphorous pesticides (66).

An increased level of ROS via damaging the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes, is the main inducer of apoptosis in spermatogenic cells (66).

Assay of sperm chromatin integrity

Several methods have been developed to evaluate sperm DNA or chromatin integrity (67, 68). A number of methods only detect breakage in single or double strands of sperm DNA. In contrast other methods are based on the fact that defects in the sperm chromatin structure have been associated with increase DNA instability and sensitivity to denaturing stress. Therefore these methods provide denaturation condition and the subsequent assessment of the sperm chromatin ability to maintain its integrity. Most of these methods are based on the staining of pre-treated spermatozoa by fluorescent or non-fluorescent dye staining. Detection of stained or unstained spermatozoa may be done by light or fluorescent microscopy. Since observational evaluations by individuals have too high inter-assay and intraassay coefficient variation (69, 70), recently most of the evaluations particularly for fluorescent dyes, are based on automated instruments such as flowcytometry.

Acidic aniline blue staining

The Acidic Aniline Blue (AAB) stain discriminates between lysine-rich histones and arginine/ cysteine-rich protamines. This stain specifically reacts with lysine residues in nuclear histones and reveals differences in the basic nuclear protein composition of the sperm. Histone-rich nuclei of immature sperm are rich in lysine and will consequently take up the blue stain. On the other hand, protamine rich nuclei of mature spermatozoa are rich in arginine and cysteine and contain relatively low levels of lysine, which means they will not be stained by Aniline blue (71).

Results of AAB have a negative correlation with sperm chromatin integrity and male fertility potential (72). However, there is a controversy on the correlation between the percentage of Aniline blue-stained spermatozoa and other sperm parameters that need to be further evaluated.

Toluidine blue staining

Toluidine Blue (TB) is a basic nuclear dye used for metachromatic and orthochromatic staining of chromatin. This stain is a sensitive structural probe for DNA. Due to the cooperative nature of metachromatic stain which is indicative only in severe DNA damaged conditions, it is revealed in only poor sperm DNA integrity. Therefore, TB staining should be used in combination with other more reliable staining methods for the assessment of sperm chromatin integrity (73).

In general, the AAB and TB are two simple and cheap methods that have the advantage of providing suitable slides for use on a light microscope (74). The smears stained with the TB method can also be used for assessment of sperm morphology. However, these methods have the inherent limits of repeatability due to dye balance differences and a low number of sperm which can be reasonably counted (74).

Chromomycin A3 staining

Chromomycin A3 (CMA3) is a guaninecytosine-specific fluorochrome and indicative of poor chromatin packaged in human sperm via indirect counting of protamine-deficient sperm. Chromomycin A3 and protamines compete for the same binding sites in the DNA. Therefore, high CMA3 stained spermatozoa is a strong indicator of the defects in protamination (75).

As a discriminator of ART success rate, CMA3 method has a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 75%. Therefore, it may provide a prognosis on the success of ART (76).

DNA Breakage Detection-Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (DBD-FISH)

In this assay, sperm was placed within an agarose gel on a slide that was exposed to an alkaline condition, which converts DNA-strand breakages into single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) motifs. After neutralizing and proteins extruding, ssDNA is available for hybridization with specific DNA probes. The probe indicates the chromatin area to be analyzed.

As DNA breakages increase, more ssDNA is created by the alkaline condition and more probe hybridizes, which leads to an increase in the fluorescence strength and surface area of the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) signal. Defects in sperm chromatin packaging significantly increase the availability of DNA ligands and the sensitivity of DNA to denaturation by alkaline condition. Therefore, DBD-FISH used for in situ evaluation and quantifycation of DNA breakages, brings to light the structural aspects of the sperm chromatin (77, 78).

Although this method shows structural aspects of sperm chromatin, it is expensive and time-consuming. In addition this assay has less clinical value and its results are not superior to the other methods (78).

In situ nick translation

The Nick Translation (NT) method measures the insertion of biotinylated deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP) at single strand DNA breakages that is catalyzed by DNA polymerase I. It particularly stains spermatozoa with considerable quantity of endogenous DNA breakage. The NT method shows abnormalities that have risen during remodeling of the sperm chromatin. As a result most of these anomalies have not been shown by standard semen analysis such as sperm morphology (79).

Application of NT assay shows an association between sperm chromatin integrity and sperm motility and morphology and to a lesser extent, sperm concentration. The NT method is used for detection of sperm DNA damage arising from causes such as heat exposures or the production of ROS following leukocytospermia and contact of sperm with leukocytes within the urogenital tract of men (79). The benefit of the NT method is direct labeling of the DNA breakage sites, and consequently the breakage sites are detectable at the molecular level (80).

Acridine Orange staining

The Acridine Orange (AO) staining as a fluorochrome measures the susceptibility of sperm DNA to acid-induced denaturation and subsequently shifts of AO fluorescence from green (double strand) to red (single strand). AO interacts with double-stranded DNA as a monomer; however it binds to single-stranded DNA as an aggregate. The monomeric AO binding to native double strand DNA emits green fluoresces, while the denatured DNA binds to aggregated AO and produces red fluoresces (81).

The AO assay, also named as Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA), is a functional assay that measures sperm quality. The variation of its results between different individuals (inter-assay) and between several assays (intra-assay) for the same sample is very high. If the inter-assay coefficient variations of AO staining method were less than 5%, it is rendered as a highly reproducible technique.

To increase the accuracy and precision of AO staining results for sperm chromatin, there is a need for more expensive instrumentation such as flowcytometer to differentiate different colors and interpret the results. Also, individual subjectivity may hinder the results if fluorescent microscopy is used (82). Since the SCSA is highly constant over a long period of time as compared to the standard parameters of semen analysis, it may be applied successfully in the epidemiological studies in the field of andrology (83).

Sperm chromatin dispersion

The Sperm Chromatin Dispersion (SCD) test is based on this fact that when sperm are exposed to an acid solution prior to lysis following the removal of nuclear proteins, the DNA dispersion halos will be observed. It presents minimally in sperm chromatin without DNA fragmentation or not produced at all in sperm chromatin with fragmented DNA (84). The major advantage of the SCD test besides the above mentioned methods is that it does not need to detect the color or fluorescence intensity. Furthermore, the test is easy, fast, and reproducible and its results are as good as to those of the SCSA (85).

Comet assay

The comet assay is a single-cell gel electrophoresis for detection of DNA fragmentation in a single cell (86). In this assay, sperms are stained with a Fluorochrome that binds to DNA. During electrophoresis, the movement of fragmented double-stranded DNA from a damaged sperm chromatin becomes visible as a comet with a tail (86). Singh et al modified the comet assay in 1988 (87) by performing electrophoresis under alkali buffers to expose alkali-labile sites on the DNA. This alteration changed the sensitivity of the assay for detection of both single and double-stranded DNA breakages (88). Recently using particular software the amount of fragmentations is quantified by measuring the displacement between the nucleus “comet head” and the resulting tail. The tail lengths are used as an index for the intensity of DNA fragmentation. However, determination of both intensity and length of the tail defines it more precisely (89).

This method is fruitfully used in the evaluation of DNA fragmentation after cryopreservation (90). It may also prognoses the success of IVF and ICSI, and embryo quality on the base of sperm chromatin integrity particularly in couples with idiopathic infertility (91, 92).

The comet is a well-standardized assay that correlates significantly with TUNEL and SCSA methods (93). It is simple to perform, has a low intra-assay coefficient of variation, and not expensive (68). It is based on fluorescent microscopy, therefore, it requires a well experienced individual to examine the slides and interpret the results.

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine Triphosphate-Nick End Labeling (TUNEL) assay

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated deoxyuridine Triphosphate-Nick End Labeling (TUNEL) assay quantifies the integration of the flurochrome or biotin labeled dUTP at single and double-strand DNA breakages in a reaction catalyzed by the Terminal deoxynucleotidyl Transferase (TdT) enzyme that is not dependent on the template. This enzyme inserts biotinlyated dUTP or FITC-dUTP at 3’-OH end of DNA breaks to prodsuce a signal. Intensity of signals depends on the number of DNA breaks at the head of spermatozoa. Therefore, sperm with normal chromatin integrity have only background fluorescence, while sperm with fragmented DNA (multiple chromatin 3’-OH ends) emit highly fluorescence light (94).

The TUNEL assay has been usually used in andrology research related to sperm chromatin integrity and it abnormalities. It gives valuable data in numerous cases of infertile and subfertile men (95, 96). The flowcytometric quantification of labeled DNA 3’-OH ends in sperm head is generally more precise and reliable; but it is much more expensive (96).

High-performance liquid chromatography

This method determines the concentration of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), which is a byproduct of oxidative damage of DNA in the sperm chromatin. It is the regularly studied biomarker for oxidative damage of sperm chromatin. Along with different oxidative adducts to DNA, 8-OHdG has been selected as a representative of oxidative damage of DNA due to its high specificity, strong mutagenicity, and relative abundance in DNA (97).

This method presents the most direct evidence suggesting the contribution of oxidative damage of DNA sperm in male infertility, based on the result that levels of 8-OHdG in sperm are significantly higher in infertile men than in fertile controls and have an opposite relation with sperm concentration (98). 8-OHdG in sperm DNA has been shown to increase in smokers, and they inversely correlate with the intake and the seminal plasma concentration of vitamin C. If 8-OHdG modifications in DNA were not repaired, it will be mutagenic and may lead to early abortion, malformations, or malignancy in children. Furthermore, this modification could be a marker of OS in sperm, which may have negative effects on sperm function (99).

Significance of sperm chromatin integrity on male fertility

It is believed that sperm chromatin integrity is correlated with male fertility (47), thus it has been shown that unexplained infertile men with normal routine semen parameters have a higher DNA Fragmentation Index (% DFI) (100). Evenson et al (101) have shown that the DFI is the most excellent predictor of couple fertility and their ability to get conceive. There are many studies evaluating the effect of DFI on ART outcomes, especially in cases with recurrent ART failure.

The relationship between sperm chromatin integrity and IUI outcome has been shown in several studies (102). Host et al found no correlation between sperm DNA breakages and the fertilization rate following ICSI (103). In contrast several other studies have found a significant negative correlation between sperm DNA fragmentation and the ICSI results (r = − 0.23, p = 0.017) (104). Sun et al (105) found a negative correlation between sperm semen analysis parameters and sperm DIF.

In a new study, the proportion of sperm with fragmented DNA correlated with numbers and embryo quality, embryo development and the rate of the ongoing pregnancies. DNA fragmentation may not influence the fertilization rate following IVF or ICSI (106). However, when the patients were divided into two category according to cut-off value of 10%, the fertilization rate was significantly higher for DNA fragmentation lower than 10% (84.1 vs. 70.7%, p < 0.05).

In a prospective study (100), Saleh et al examined the relationship between sperm DNA damage and ART outcomes in 33 couples with approved male factor infertility. They found that the sperm DFI was negatively correlated with sperm concentration (r = − 0.31, p = 0.001), p motility (r = − 0.47; p < 0.001) and normal sperm morphology (r = − 0.40; p < 0.0001) (100).

The current data suggest that fertilization and pregnancy rates following ICSI, are not related to the severity of the sperm defects (106). This finding has caused debate on the usefulness of ICSI to increase fertilization, rare in patients with teratozoospermia. This may affect the quality of embryos and the resulting fetus (107). Therefore, there is a concern about the possible role of elevated sperm DNA fragmentation on embryo quality (103, 108110), since sperm with abnormal morphology might be able to create an embryo using ICSI procedure.

However, it is suggested that low levels of DNA fragmentation can be repaired by the oocyte machinery (111, 112). In contrast high levels of DNA breaks that are further than repair, will trigger the apoptosis process followed by fragmentation of the early embryo or morbidity in later life (105). It may be the cause of early fragmentation in embryos created in IVF cycles. The rate of blastocyst stage is low in patients with high DIF, but natural selection will guarantee that most of them will abort before growing to term (113). This may be a reason for low efficiency of fertility process and especially assisted reproductive techniques.

Recently, the importance of paternal role in early embryo development has been shown in view of that increased chromosomal damage is related to repeated spontaneous abortions (114).

Repair and prevention of sperm chromatin damage

Sperm chromatin abnormality can be repaired during the period between sperm entry into the ooplasm and the beginning of the next S phase, by virtue of pre and post replication mechanisms (115). Therefore, the conesquences of sperm chromatin abnormality on ART outcomes, relates to the collective effects of sperm DNA breaks dosage and the ability of the oocyte to repair the preexisting damage. Though, if sperm with high level of chromatin damages are applied in ICSI or IVF cycles, the oocyte's repair competence might be insufficient or not enough. This will lead to fragmentation and a low embryo quality that is followed by in vitro produced embryo fragmentation and elevated rate of early pregnancy loss (113, 116).

Sperm processing methods certainly influence selection of healthy population of spermatozoa. The chromatin integrity of processed sperm is usually more than that of un-prepared semen (117). Simple preparation techniques such as density gradient centrifugation can enrich sperm normal morphology and normal nuclear integrity (118). This improving effect of density gradient centrifugation can be the explanation for little prognostic value of sperm parameters prior to preparation in terms of fertilization and pregnancy using ARTs (119). This valuable effect corresponds with the somewhat high post-IVF fertilization rate using a simple swim-up method (120).

In-vitro culture of testicular tissue has also been showed to increase the motility and recovery rate of testicular spermatozoa (121). The ROS production increases when spermatozoa are cultured in medium containing leukocytes, abnormal spermatozoa, and transition metals. Therefore using the processing method itself may be the cause of DNA damage. However, supporting data show that culture of testicular tissue does not increase the liability of its spermatozoa to chromatin damage. In sperm recovered from obstructive azoospermia, the proportion of spermatozoa with single stranded DNA breaks decreased considerably following 3 days of in vitro culture (p = 0.005) (47). Likewise, immature germ cellS cultured in vitro for 48 hrs, make it possible to select TUNEL-negative spermatids (122).

While ROS production is a main cause of sperm chromatin damage, antioxidant therapy may be the major approach to protect sperm chromatin integrity. When Ascorbic Acid (600 mmol/l), Alpha-tocopherol (30 and 60 mmol/l) and Urate (400 mmol/l) are added to culture media, it provides considerable protection (p < 0.001) from DNA damage following exposure to X-irradiation. Thus, supplementation of culture media with antioxidants individually, can beneficially influence the sperm chromatin integrity (123).

Plant derived compounds of Genistein and Equol (Isoflavones) have antioxidant activity, and so a function is suggested for them in the treatment of male infertility. In comparison with Ascorbic acid and Alpha-tocopherol, Genistein is the most potent antioxidant, followed by Equol, Ascorbic acid and Alpha-tocopherol in culture medium. Genistein and Equol in combination are more protective to neutralize the oxidative stress. According to above results, these compounds also may have a role in antioxidant protection sperm chromatin integrity and preventing from DNA damage (124).

In addition, several studies showed that administration of antioxidant supplement such as Ascorbic acid, Alpha-tocopherol, Beta carotene, Retinol, Coenzyme Q (Q10), etc. in combination with drugs such as folic acid, zinc sulfate, carnitine, etc can improve the routine parameters of semen, sperm chromatin integrity and the outcome of ARTs (125130).

Conclusion

It has recently been accepted that sperm chromatin integrity is an independent index of sperm quality and has better diagnostic and prognostic capacities in association with routine semen analysis results for both in vivo and in vitro fertility. Although there are numerous methods to evaluate sperm chromatin integrity, each procedure needs to be studied more and standardized for routine use in diagnostic andrology lab. However, all of these methods destroy sperm during the evaluation process. Introducing methods with some effect on whole sperm integrity will improve outcomes of ARTs using spermatozoa with approved chromatin integrity. The results may help the physicians to counsel infertile couples referred for ART in a better manner. In addition, sperm preparation techniques and in vitro culture of spermatozoa in special conditions, may develop its quality in men having high percentage of DFI.

References Kidd SA Eskenazi B Wyrobek AJ Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature Fertil Steril 2001 75 2 237 248 Schoor RA Prostatitis and male infertility: evidence and links Curr Urol Rep 2002 3 4 324 329 Lewis SEM Agbaje I Alvarez J Sperm DNA tests as useful Adjuncts to semen analysis Syst Biol Reprod Med 2008 54 3 111 125 Love CC Kenney RM Scrotal heat stress induces altered sperm chromatin structure associated with a decrease in protamine disulfide bonding in the stallion Biol Reprod 1999 60 3 615 620 Aitken RJ Sawyer D The human spermatozoon not waving but drowning Adv Exp Med Biol 2003 518 85 98 Alvarez JG DNA fragmentation in human sperm-atozoa: significance in the diagnosis and treatment of infertility Minerva Ginecol 2003 55 3 233 239 Tomlinson MJ White A Barratt CLR Bolton AE Cooke ID The removal of morphologically abnormal sperm forms by phagocytes: a positive role for seminal leukocytes Hum Reprod 1992 7 4 517 522 Sigman M Lopes L The correlation between round cells and white blood cells in the semen J Urol 1993 149 5 1338 1340 Cohen PE Pollard JW Bronson R Cytokines and growth factors in reproduction Re-productive Immunology 1996 Cambridge, MA Black-well Science 52 102 Reichart M Kahane I Bartoov B In vivo and in vitro impairment of human and ram sperm nuclear chromatin integrity by sexually transmitted Urea-plasma urealyticum infection Biol Reprod 2000 63 4 1041 1048 Kunzle R Mueller MD Hanggi W Birkahuser MH Drescher H Bersinger NA Semen quality of male smokers and nonsmokers in infertile couples Fertil Steril 2003 79 2 287 291 Potts RJ Newbury CJ Smith G Notarianni LJ Jef-feries TM Sperm chromatin damage associated with male smoking Mutat Res 1999 423 1-2 103 111 Comhaire FH Mahmoud AM Depuydt CE Zalata AA Christofe AB Mechanism and effects of male genital tract infection on sperm quality and fertilizing potential: the andrologist's view point Hum Reprod Update 1999 5 5 393 398 Aitken RJ Buckingham D Brindle J Gomez E Baker G Irvine S Analysis of sperm movement in relation to the oxidative stress created by leukocytes in washed sperm preparations and seminal plasma Hum Reprod 1995 10 8 2061 2071 Fraga CG Motchnik PA Wyrobek AJ Rempel DM Ames BN Smoking and low antioxidant levels increase oxidative damage to sperm DNA Mutat Res 1996 351 2 199 203 Donnelly ET Steele EK McClure N Lewis SE Assessment of DNA integrity and morphology of ejaculated spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men before and after cryopreservation Hum Reprod 2001 16 6 1191 1199 Donnelly ET McClure N Lewis SE Cryopreservation of human semen and prepared sperm: effects on motility parameters and DNA integrity Fertil Steril 2001 76 5 892 900 Duty SM Singh NP Ryan L Chen Z Lewis C Hunag T Reliability of the comet assay in cryopreserved human sperm Hum Reprod 2002 17 5 1274 1280 Giwercman A Petersen PM Cancer and male infertility Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 14 453 471 Richter MA Haning RV Shapiro SS Jr Artificial donor insemination: fresh versus frozen semen; the patient as her own control Fertil Steril 1984 41 2 277 280 Revel A Haimov-Kochman R Porat A Lewin A Simon A Laufer N In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection success rates with cryopreserved sperm from patients with malignant disease Fertil Steril 2005 84 1 118 122 Kobayashi H Larson K Sharma RK Nelson DR Evenson DP Toma H DNA damage in cancer patients before treatment as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay Fertil Steril 2001 75 3 469 475 Chatterjee R Haines GA Perera DM Goldstone A Morris ID Testicular and sperm DNA damage after treatment with fludarabine for chronic lymphocytic leukemia Hum Reprod 2000 15 4 762 766 Cai L Hales BF Robaire B Induction of apoptosis on the germ cells of adult male rats after exposure to cyclophosphamide Biol Reprod 1997 56 6 1490 1497 Li H Jian Y Rajpurkar R Dunbar JC Dhabuwala CB Cocaine induced apoptosis in rat testes J Urol 1999 162 1 213 216 Ondrizek RR Chan PJ Patton WC King A An alternative medicine study of herbal effects on the penetration of zona-free hamster oocytes and the integrity of sperm deoxyribonucleic acid Fertil Steril 1999 71 3 517 522 Perez-Crespo M Pintado B Gutierrez-Adan A Scrotal heat stress effects on sperm viability, sperm DNA integrity, and the offspring sex ratio in mice Mol Reprod Dev 2008 75 1 40 47 Aitken RJ De Iulis GN Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells Reprod Biomed Online 2007 14 6 727 733 Tesarik J Mendoza TR Mendoza C Sperm nuclear DNA damage: update on the mechanism, diagnosis and treatment Reprod Biomed Online 2006 12 6 715 721 Ozmen B Koutlaki N Youssry M Diedrich K Al Hasani S DNA damage of human spermatozoa in assisted reproduction: origins, diagnosis, impacts, and safety Reprod Biomed Online 2007 14 3 384 395 Carrell DT Emery BR Hammoud S The etiology of sperm protamine abnormalities and their potential impact on the sperm epigenome Int J Andrology 2008 31 6 537 545 Evenson DP Larson KL Jost LK Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons J Andrology 2002 23 1 25 43 Ward WS Deoxyribonucleic acid loop domain tertiary structure in mammalian spermatozoa Biol Reprod 1993 48 6 1193 1201 D'Occhio MJ Hengstberger KJ Johnston SD Biology of sperm chromatin structure and relationship to male fertility and embryonic survival Animal Reprod Sci 2007 101 1-2 1 17 Balhorn R Cosman M Thornton K Krishnan VV Corzett M Bench E Kramer C Gagnon C Protamine mediated condensation of DNA in mammalian sperm The male gamete: from basic knowledge to clinical applications 1999 Illinois Cache River Press 55 70 Sakkas D Mariethoz E Manicardi G Bizzaro D Bianchi PG Bianchi U Origin of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa Rev Reprod 1999 4 31 37 Henkel R Hajimohammad M Stalf T Hoogendijk C Mehnert C Menkveld R Gips H Influence of deoxyribonucleic acid damage on fertilization and pregnancy Fertil Steril 2004 81 4 965 972 Lewis SEM Aitken RJ DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy Cell Tissue Res 2005 322 1 33 41 Vogt PH Molecular genetics of human male infertility: from genes to new therapeutic perspectives Curr Pharm Design 2004 10 5 471 500 Carrell DT Emery BR Hammoud S Altered protamine expression and diminished spermato-genesis: what is the link? Hum Reprod Update 2007 13 3 313 327 Aoki VW Liu L Jones KP Hatasaka HH Gibson M Peterson CM Sperm protamine1/protamine 2 ratios are related to in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and predictive of fertileization ability Fertil Steril 2006 86 5 1408 1415 Tseden K Topaloglu O Meinhardt A Dev A Adham I Muller C Premature translation of transition protein 2 mRNA causes sperm abnormalities and male infertility Mol Reprod Dev 2007 74 3 273 279 Torregrosa N Dominguez-Fandos D Camejo MI Shirley CR Meistrich ML Ballesca JL Protamine 2 precursors, protamine 1/protamine 2 ratio, DNA integrity and other sperm parameters in infertile patients Human Reprod 2006 21 8 2084 2089 Dadoune JP Expression of mammalian spermatozoal nucleoproteins Microsc Res Tech 2003 61 1 56 75 Brewer L Corzett M Balhorn R Condensation of DNA by spermatid basic nuclear proteins J Biol Chem 2002 41 38895 38900 Brewer L Corzett M Lau EY Balhorn R Dynamics of protamine 1 binding to single DNA molecules J Biol Chem 2003 278 42403 42408 Agarwal A Said TM Role of sperm chromatin abnormalities and DNA damage in male infertility Hum Reprod Update 2003 9 4 331 345 Kocak I Dundar M Hekimgil M Okyay P Assessment of germ cell apoptosis in cryptorchid rats Asian J Androl 2002 4 3 183 186 Sinha Hikim AP Swerdloff RS Hormonal and genetic control of germ cell apoptosis in the testis Rev Reprod 1999 4 38 47 Lee J Richburg JH Younkin SC Boekelheide K The Fas system is a key regulator of germ cell apoptosis in the testis Endocrinology 1997 138 5 2081 2088 Suda T Takahashi T Goldstein P Nagata S Molecular cloning and expression of Fas ligand, a novel member of tumor necrosis factor family Cell 1993 75 6 1169 1178 Rodriguez I Ody C Araki K Garcia I Vassali P An early and massive wave of germinal cell apoptosis is required for the development of functional spermatogenesis EMBO J 1997 16 9 2262 2270 Huszar G Sbracia M Vigue L Miller DJ Shur BD Sperm plasma membrane remodeling during spermiogenic maturation in men: relationship among plasma membrane beat 1,4 galacto-syltransferase, cytoplasmic creatine phosphokinase and creatine phosphokinase isoform ratios Biol Reprod 1997 56 4 1020 1024 Thornberry NA Lazebnik Y Caspases: enemies within Science 1998 281 5381 1312 1316 Kim JM Ghosh SR Weil ACP Zirkin BR Caspase-3 and caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease are associated with testicular germ cell apoptosis resulting from reduced intratesticular testosterone Endocrinology 2001 142 9 3809 3816 Shafik A Shafik AA Shafik I El Sibai O Sperm DNA fragmentation Arch Androl 2006 52 197 208 Kodama H Yamaguchi R Fukuda J Kasai H Tanaka T Increased oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage in the spermatozoa of infertile male patients Fertil Steril 1997 68 3 519 524 Barroso G Morshedi M Oehninger S Analysis of DNA fragmentation, plasma membrane trans-location of phosphatidylserine and oxidative stress in human spermatozoa Hum Reprod 2000 15 6 1338 1344 Kemal Duru N Morshedi M Oehninger S Effects of hydrogen peroxide on DNA and plasma membrane integrity of human spermatozoa Fertil Steril 2000 74 6 1200 1207 Aitken RJ Krausz C Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome Reproduction 2001 122 497 506 Spiropoulos J Turnbull DM Chinnery PF Can mitochondrial DNA mutations cause sperm dys-function? Mol Hum Reprod 2002 8 8 719 721 Sharma RK Said T Agarwal A Sperm DNA damage and its clinical relevance in assessing reproductive outcome Asian J Androl 2004 6 139 148 Vernet P Fulton N Wallace C Aitken RJ Analysis of reactive oxygen species generating systems in rat epididymal spermatozoa Biol Reprod 2001 65 4 1102 1113 Baker MA Aitken RJ Reactive oxygen species in spermatozoa: methods for monitoring and significance for the origins of genetic disease and infertility Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2005 3 67 75 Balercia G Moretti S Vignini A Magagnini M Mantero F Boscaro M Role of nitric oxide concentrations on human sperm motility J Androl 2004 25 2 245 249 Agarwal A Makker K Sharma R Clinical relevance of oxidative stress in male factor infertility: an update Am J Reprod Immunol 2008 59 2 11 Erenpreiss J Jepson K Giwercman A Tsarev I Erenpreisa J Spano M Toluidine blue cytometry test for sperm DNA conformation: comparison with the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure and TUNEL assays Hum Reprod 2004 19 10 2277 2282 Chan PJ Corselli JU Patton WC Jacobson JD Chana SR King A A simple comet assay for archived sperm correlates DNA fragmentation to reduced hyperactivation and penetration of zona-free hamster oocytes Fertil Steril 2001 75 1 186 192 Hodjat M Akhondi MA Al-Hasani S Mobaraki M Sadeghi MR Increased sperm ubiquitination correlates with abnormal chromatin integrity Reprod Biomed Online 2008 17 3 324 330 Hodjat M Akhondi MA Amirjanati N Savadi Shirazi E Sadeghi MR The comparison of four different sperm chromatin assays and their correlation with semen parameters TUMJ 2008 65 Suppl 3 33 40 Hammadeh M Zeginiadov T Rosenbaum P Georg T Schmidt W Strehler E Predictive value of sperm chromatin condensation (aniline blue staining) in the assessment of male fertility Arch Androl 2001 46 2 99 104 Foresta C Zorzi M Rossato M Varotto A Sperm nuclear instability and staining with aniline blue: abnormal persistence of histones in spermatozoa in infertile men Int J Androl 1992 15 4 330 337 Erenpreiss A Bars J Lipatnikova V Erenpreisa J Zalkalns J Comparative study of cytochemical tests for sperm chromatin integrity J Androl 2001 22 1 45 53 Agarwal A Said TM Gardner DK Weismann A Sperm chromatin assessment Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques 2009 United Kingdom InForma Health Care 93 106 Manicardi G Bianchi P Pantano S Azzoni P D. Bizzaro D Bianchi U Presence of endogenous nicks in DNA of ejaculated human spermatozoa and its relationship to chromomycin A3 accessibility Biol Reprod 1995 52 864 867 Esterhuizen A Franken D Laurens JGH Prinsloo E van Rooyen LH Sperm chromatin packaging as an indicator of in vitro fertilization rates Hum Reprod 2000 15 3 657 661 Fernandez JL Goyanes VJ Ramiro-Diaz J Gosál-vez J Application of FISH for in situ detection and quantification of DNA breakage Cytogenet Cell Genet 1998 82 3-4 251 256 Fernandez J Vazquez-Gundin F Delgado A Goy-anes J Ramiro-Diaz J de la Torre J DNA breakage detection-FISH (DBD-FISH) in human spermatozoa: technical variants evidence different structural features Mutat Res 2000 453 1 77 82 Gopalkrishnan K Hurkadli K Padwal V Balaiah D Use of acridine orange to evaluate chromatin integrity of human spermatozoa in different groups of infertile men Andralogia 1999 31 5 277 282 Gorczyza W Gong J Darzynkiewics Z Detection of DNA strand breaks in individual apoptotic cells by the in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and nick translation assays Cancer Res 1993 53 1945 1951 Variant-Klun I Tomazevic T Meden-Vrtovec H Sperm single-stranded DNA, detected by acridine orange staining, reduces fertilization and quality of ICSI derived embryos J Assist Reprod Genet 2002 19 7 319 328 Katayose H Yanagida K Hashimoto S Yamada H Sato A Use of diamide-acridine orange fluorescence staining to detect aberrant protamination of human ejaculated sperm nuclei Fertil Steril 2003 79 670 676 Spano M Kolstad AH Larsen SB Cordelli E Leter G Giweroman A The applicability of the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure assay in epidemiological studies Hum Reprod 1998 13 2495 2505 Singh N Danner DB Tice R Mccoy MT Collins GD Schneider EL Abundant alkali-sensitive sites in DNA of human and mouse sperm Exp Cell Res 1989 184 2 461 470 Fernandez J Muriel L Rivero MT Goyanes V Vazque R Alvarez JG The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation J Androl 2003 24 1 59 66 Ostling O Johanson KJ Microelectrophoretic study of radiation induced DNA damages on individual cells Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1984 123 1 291 298 Singh NP McCoy MT Tice RR Schneider EL A simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells Exp Cell Res 1988 175 1 184 191 Singh NP Danner DB Tice RR Mccoy MT Collins GD Schneider EL Abundant alkali-sensitive sites in DNA of human and mouse sperm Exp Cell Res 1989 184 2 461 470 Hellman B Vaghef H Bostrom B The concepts of tail moment and tail inertia in the single cell gel electrophoresis assay Mutat Res 1995 336 2 123 131 Duty SM Singh NP Ryan L Chen Z Lewis C Huang T Reliability of the comet assay in cryopreserved human sperm Hum Reprod 2002 17 5 1274 1280 Morris ID Ilott S Dixon L Brison DR The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization Hum Reprod 2002 17 4 990 998 Tomsu M Sharma V Miller D Embryo quality and IVF treatment outcomes may correlate with different sperm comet assay parameters Hum Reprod 2002 17 7 1856 1862 Aravindan GR Bjordahl J Jost LK Evenson DP Susceptibility of human sperm to in situ DNA denaturation is strongly correlated with DNA strand breaks identified by single cell electrophoresis Exp Cell Res 1997 236 1 231 237 Gorczyza W Gong J Darzynkiewics Z Detection of DNA strand breaks in individual apoptotic cells by the in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyl trans-ferase and nick translation assays Cancer Res 1993 53 1945 1951 Tunc O Thompson J Tremellen K Improvement in sperm DNA quality using an oral antioxidant therapy Reprod Biomed Online 2009 18 6 761 768 Barroso G Morshedi M Oehninger S Analysis of DNA fragmentation, plasma membrane trans-location of phosphatidylserine and oxidative stress in human spermatozoa Hum Reprod 2000 15 6 1338 1344 Shen HM Ong CN Detection of oxidative DNA damage in human sperm and its association with sperm function and male infertility Free Radic Biol Med 2000 28 4 529 536 Kodama H Yamaguchi R Fukuda J Kasai H Tanaka T Increased deoxyribonucleic acid damage in the spermatozoa of infertile male patients Fertil Steril 1997 68 3 519 524 Loft S Kold-Jensen T Hjollund N Giweroman A Geyllemborg J Ernst E Oxidative DNA damage in human sperm influences time to pregnancy Hum Reprod 2003 18 6 1265 1272 Saleh RA Agarwal A Nada EA El-Tonsy MH Sharma RK Meyer A Negative effects of increased sperm DNA damage in relation to seminal oxidative stress in men with idiopathic and male factor infertility Fertil Steril 2003 79 Suppl 3 1597 1605 Evenson DP Jost LK Marshall D Zinaman MJ Clegg E Purvis K Utility of sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic Hum Reprod 1999 14 4 1039 1049 Duran EH Morshedi M Taylor S Oehringer S Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination, outcome: a prospective cohort study Hum Reprod 2002 17 12 3122 3128 Host E Lindenberg S Smidt-Jensen S The role of DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa used for IVF and ICSI Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000 79 7 559 563 Lopes S Sun JG Jurisicova A Meriano J Casper RF Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation is increased in poor-quality semen samples and correlates with failed fertilization in intracytoplasmic sperm injection Fertil Steril 1998 69 3 528 32 Sun JG Jurisicova A Casper RF Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro Biol Reprod 1997 56 602 607 Benchaib M Braun V Lornage J Hadj S Salle B Lejeune H Sperm DNA fragmentation decreases the pregnancy rate in an assisted reproductive technique Hum Reprod 2003 18 5 1023 1028 Silber SJ Van Steirteghem AC Liu J Nagy Z Tournaye H Devroey P High fertilization and pregnancy rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with spermatozoa obtained from testicle biopsy Hum Reprod 1995 10 1 148 152 Cummins JM Jequire AM Kan R Molecular biology of human male infertility: links with aging, mitochondrial genetics, and oxidative stress? Mol Reprod Dev 1994 37 3 345 362 Larson KL DeJonge CJ Barnes AM Jost LK Evenson DP Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters as predictors of failed pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques Hum Reprod 2000 15 8 1717 1722 Edwards RG Beard HK Is the success of human IVF more a matter of genetics and evolution than growing blastocysts? Hum Reprod 1999 14 1 1 6 Matsuda Y Tobari I Repair capacity of fertilized mouse eggs for X-ray damage induced in sperm and mature oocytes Mutat Res 1989 210 1 35 47 Genesca A Caballin MR Miro R Benet J Germa JR Egozcue J Repair of human sperm chromosome aberrations in the hamster egg Hum Genet 1992 89 2 181 186 Ahmadi A Ng SC Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa J Exp Zool 1999 284 6 696 704 Rosenbusch B Sterzik K Sperm chromosomes and habitual abortion Fertil Steril 1991 56 2 370 372 Genesca A Caballin MR Miro R Benet J Germ JR Egoscue J Repair of human sperm chromosome aberrations in the hamster egg Hum Genet 1992 89 2 181 186 Ahmadi A Ng SC Developmental capacity of damaged spermatozoa Hum Reprod 1999 14 9 2279 2285 Donnelly ET O'Connell M McClure N Lewis SE Differences in nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial integrity of semen and prepared human spermatozoa Hum Reprod 2000 15 7 1552 1561 Golan R Shochat L Weissenberg R Soffer Y Marcus Z Oschry Y Evaluation of chromatin condensation in human spermatozoa: a flow cytometric assay using acridine orange staining Mol Hum Reprod 1997 3 47 54 Tomlinson MJ Moffatt O Manicardi GC Bizzaro D Afnan M Sakkas D Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception Hum Reprod 2001 16 10 2160 2165 Younglai EV Holt D Brown P Jurisicova A Casper RF Sperm swim-up technique and DNA fragmentation Hum Reprod 2001 16 9 1950 1953 Emiliani S Van den Bergh M Vannin AS Biramane J Verdoodt M Englert Y Increased spermatozoa motility after in vitro culture of testicular biopsies from obstructive azoospermic patients results in better post thaw recovery rate Hum Reprod 2000 15 11 2371 2374 Tesarik J Mendoza C Greco E In vitro culture facilitates the selection of healthy spermatids for assisted reproduction Fertil Steril 1999 72 5 809 813 Hughes CM Lewis SEM McKelvey-Martin VJ Thompson W The effects of antioxidant supplementation during Percoll preparation on human sperm DNA integrity Hum Reprod 1998 13 1240 1247 Sierens J Hartley JA Campbell MJ Leathem AJ Woodside JV In vitro isoflavone supplementation reduces hydrogen peroxide induced DNA damage in sperm Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 2002 22 3 227 234 Silver EW Eskenazi B Evenson DP Block G Young S Wyrobek AJ Effect of antioxidant intake on sperm chromatin stability in healthy nonsmoking men J Androl 2005 26 4 550 556 Hampl JS Taylor CA Johnston CS Vitamin C Deficiency and depletion in the United States: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1994 Am J Public Health 2004 94 5 870 875 Balercia G Buldreghini E Vignini A Tiano L Paggi F Amoroso S Coenzyme Q10 treatment in infertile men with idiopathic asthenozoospermia: a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized trial Fertil Steril 2009 91 5 1785 1792 Wong WY Merkus HM Thomas CM Menkveld R Zielhuis GA Steegers-Theunissen RP Effects of folic acid and zinc sulfate on male factor subfertility: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial Fertil Steril 2002 77 3 491 498 Lenzi A Lombardo F Sgro P Salacone P Capon-ecchia L Dondero F Use of carnitine therapy in selected cases of male factor infertility: a double-blind crossover trial Fertil Steril 2003 79 2 292 300 Patel SR Sigman M Antioxidant therapy in male infertility Urol Clin North Am 2008 35 2 319 330